Restaurant Brands Asia Limited
PosiFunda Ratios Only on PositoAI
PositoAI's own ratios from Restaurant Brands Asia Limited's yearly results (2023–2026), compared with Consumer Cyclical companies in India. Tap ? on any ratio for what it means.
What stands out
- Cash Locked Ratio: Money owed to suppliers is larger than money owed by customers plus stock: ₹13 per ₹100 of sales comes from others' credit, against ₹18 from others' credit three years earlier. Less money tied up than 96% of Consumer Cyclical companies in India.
- Shareholder Slice Ratio: Share count rose 18% in 3 years, so each share's slice of the company became smaller. Bigger rise in share count than 91% of Consumer Cyclical companies in India.
- Steadiness Ratio: Sales and profit both grew in each of the last 3 years. Steadier than 88% of Consumer Cyclical companies in India.
Where ₹100 of sales goes
Latest year (Mar 2026). Taxes and other income are not shown, so the parts need not add up to 100.
Cash quality
Profit Cash Ratio
—Loss-making or profit too small
Over the last 3 years profit was a loss or under 2% of sales, so cash per 100 of profit is not meaningful.
Self-Funding Ratio
1.1×Over the last 3 years its own operating cash covered its investment spending (capex) 1.1 times.
Lower than 58% of Consumer Cyclical companies in India.
Cash Locked Ratio
−₹13Money owed to suppliers is larger than money owed by customers plus stock: ₹13 per ₹100 of sales comes from others' credit, against ₹18 from others' credit three years earlier.
Less money tied up than 96% of Consumer Cyclical companies in India.
Growth quality
Steadiness Ratio
3/3 · 3/3Sales and profit both grew in each of the last 3 years.
Steadier than 88% of Consumer Cyclical companies in India.
Growth Efficiency Ratio
₹5Sales grew 37% in 3 years; of every extra ₹100 of sales, ₹5 became extra profit.
Lower than 59% of Consumer Cyclical companies in India.
Asset Productivity Ratio
+37% / +36%In 3 years sales changed by +37% while total assets changed by +36%. Both moved at about the same pace.
Balance-sheet strength
Debt Due Cover Ratio
2.7×Debt due within a year is covered 2.7 times by its yearly operating cash.
Higher than 72% of Consumer Cyclical companies in India.
Cash Cushion Ratio
−29%Debt, after subtracting cash, equals 29% of its market value (net debt).
Lower than 73% of Consumer Cyclical companies in India.
Tangible Assets Ratio
97%Of every ₹100 the company owns, ₹97 is in tangible assets such as plants, cash, stock and receivables; the rest is goodwill and other intangibles.
Less tangible than 74% of Consumer Cyclical companies in India.
Tangible Net Worth Ratio
87%Of every ₹100 of net worth, ₹87 is tangible; the rest is goodwill and other intangibles, often from buying other companies.
Less tangible than 82% of Consumer Cyclical companies in India.
Shareholders
Standard fundamentals
P/E, P/B, ROE, debt, growth and more (13)
Restaurant Brands Asia Limited made a loss over the last year. Restaurant Brands Asia Limited owes ₹0.80 for every ₹1 it owns. Restaurant Brands Asia Limited made a loss in each of the last two years.
Compared with Consumer Cyclical companies in India · latest annual results Mar 2026.
P/E ratio
LossRestaurant Brands Asia Limited made a loss over the last year, so its P/E ratio is not meaningful.
P/B ratio
8.53The share price is 8.53 times Restaurant Brands Asia Limited's book value per share, higher than 88% of Consumer Cyclical companies in India.
Market cap
₹6,149 CrThe total market value of all of Restaurant Brands Asia Limited's shares at today's price (share price × number of shares), larger than 73% of Consumer Cyclical companies in India. PosiCap size class: Mini Cap.
Net worth (book value)
₹721 CrWhat Restaurant Brands Asia Limited would have left on paper if it sold everything it owns and paid everything it owes, from its latest balance sheet (31 Mar 2026).
Book value per share
₹10.12Net worth divided by the number of shares. The share price of ₹86.34 is 8.5 times this, which is the P/B above.
Return on equity (ROE)
-23.8%Restaurant Brands Asia Limited lost 23.8% of its shareholders' money over the last year, lower than 97% of Consumer Cyclical companies in India.
Owes vs Owns
0.80×Restaurant Brands Asia Limited owes ₹0.80 for every ₹1 it owns (moderate), higher than 95% of Consumer Cyclical companies in India.
Dividend yield
NoneRestaurant Brands Asia Limited does not currently pay a dividend.
Revenue growth
+11%Revenue rose 11% in the year to Mar 2026, and grew 11% a year on average over 3 years.
Profit growth
LossRestaurant Brands Asia Limited made a loss in each of the last two years.
Profit margin
-6.7%Restaurant Brands Asia Limited lost ₹7 for every ₹100 of revenue.
Interest cover
Not coveredRestaurant Brands Asia Limited's operating profit did not cover its interest costs in the year to Mar 2026.
Cash vs debt
Net debtRestaurant Brands Asia Limited had ₹1,774 Cr more debt than cash (net debt) at Mar 2026.
Questions
How is P/B calculated on PositoAI?
P/B is market cap divided by net worth from the latest balance sheet. For Restaurant Brands Asia Limited: ₹6,149 Cr ÷ ₹721 Cr (31 Mar 2026) = 8.5.
What is Restaurant Brands Asia Limited's return on equity?
Restaurant Brands Asia Limited lost 23.8% of its shareholders' money over the last year, lower than 97% of Consumer Cyclical companies in India.
How much does Restaurant Brands Asia Limited owe compared with what it owns?
Restaurant Brands Asia Limited owes ₹0.80 for every ₹1 it owns (moderate), higher than 95% of Consumer Cyclical companies in India.
Does Restaurant Brands Asia Limited pay a dividend?
No. Restaurant Brands Asia Limited does not currently pay a dividend.
Is Restaurant Brands Asia Limited's revenue growing?
Revenue rose 11% in the year to Mar 2026, and grew 11% a year on average over 3 years.
Figures from the company's yearly results and PositoAI's own data. Full tables are on the Go Deep tab. What each figure means. PositoAI is for research and education only and is not investment advice.