Full House Resorts, Inc.
PosiFunda Ratios Only on PositoAI
PositoAI's own ratios from Full House Resorts, Inc.'s yearly results (2022–2025), compared with Consumer Cyclical companies in United States. Tap ? on any ratio for what it means.
What stands out
- Tangible Net Worth Ratio: Goodwill and other intangibles are larger than its whole net worth, so its tangible net worth is negative. Less tangible than almost all Consumer Cyclical companies in United States.
- Cash Cushion Ratio: Debt, after subtracting cash, is 13.8 times its market value (net debt). Lower than 98% of Consumer Cyclical companies in United States.
- Cash Locked Ratio: Money owed to suppliers is larger than money owed by customers plus stock: $4 per $100 of sales comes from others' credit, against $20 from others' credit three years earlier. Less money tied up than 94% of Consumer Cyclical companies in United States.
Where $100 of sales goes
Latest year (Dec 2025). Taxes and other income are not shown, so the parts need not add up to 100.
Cash quality
Profit Cash Ratio
—Loss-making or profit too small
Over the last 3 years profit was a loss or under 2% of sales, so cash per 100 of profit is not meaningful.
Self-Funding Ratio
0.2×Over the last 3 years its own operating cash paid for 17% of its investment spending (capex); the rest came from other sources such as borrowing, cash reserves or new shares.
Lower than 84% of Consumer Cyclical companies in United States.
Cash Locked Ratio
−$4Money owed to suppliers is larger than money owed by customers plus stock: $4 per $100 of sales comes from others' credit, against $20 from others' credit three years earlier.
Less money tied up than 94% of Consumer Cyclical companies in United States.
Growth quality
Steadiness Ratio
3/3 · 1/3Sales grew in 3 of the last 3 years; profit grew in 1 of 3.
Steadier than 68% of Consumer Cyclical companies in United States.
Growth Efficiency Ratio
−$18Sales grew 85% in 3 years, but profit fell: $18 less profit per $100 of extra sales.
Lower than 74% of Consumer Cyclical companies in United States.
Asset Productivity Ratio
+85% / +9%In 3 years sales changed by +85% while total assets changed by +9%. Sales grew faster than assets.
Balance-sheet strength
Debt Due Cover Ratio
32.5×Debt due within a year is covered 32.5 times by its yearly operating cash.
Higher than 86% of Consumer Cyclical companies in United States.
Cash Cushion Ratio
13.8× debtDebt, after subtracting cash, is 13.8 times its market value (net debt).
Lower than 98% of Consumer Cyclical companies in United States.
Tangible Assets Ratio
80%Of every $100 the company owns, $80 is in tangible assets such as plants, cash, stock and receivables; the rest is goodwill and other intangibles.
Less tangible than 58% of Consumer Cyclical companies in United States.
Tangible Net Worth Ratio
NegativeGoodwill and other intangibles are larger than its whole net worth, so its tangible net worth is negative.
Less tangible than almost all Consumer Cyclical companies in United States.
Shareholders
Standard fundamentals
P/E, P/B, ROE, debt, growth and more (12)
Full House Resorts, Inc. made a loss over the last year. Full House Resorts, Inc. owes $1.02 for every $1 it owns. Full House Resorts, Inc. made a loss in each of the last two years.
Compared with Consumer Cyclical companies in United States · latest annual results Dec 2025.
P/E ratio
LossFull House Resorts, Inc. made a loss over the last year, so its P/E ratio is not meaningful.
P/B ratio
-2.67Full House Resorts, Inc.'s book value is negative (it owes more than it owns), so P/B is not meaningful.
Market cap
$36 MThe total market value of all of Full House Resorts, Inc.'s shares at today's price (share price × number of shares), smaller than 91% of Consumer Cyclical companies in United States. PosiCap size class: Micro Cap.
Net worth (book value)
NegativeFull House Resorts, Inc.'s net worth is negative ($13 M below zero, balance sheet 30 Jun 2026): it owes more than it owns, so book value per share and P/B are not meaningful.
Return on equity (ROE)
-936.4%Full House Resorts, Inc. lost 936.4% of its shareholders' money over the last year, lower than 98% of Consumer Cyclical companies in United States.
Owes vs Owns
1.02×Full House Resorts, Inc. owes $1.02 for every $1 it owns, so it owes more than it owns, higher than 89% of Consumer Cyclical companies in United States.
Dividend yield
NoneFull House Resorts, Inc. does not currently pay a dividend.
Revenue growth
+4%Revenue rose 4% in the year to Dec 2025, and grew 23% a year on average over 3 years.
Profit growth
LossFull House Resorts, Inc. made a loss in each of the last two years.
Profit margin
-13.3%Full House Resorts, Inc. lost $13 for every $100 of revenue.
Interest cover
0.1×Full House Resorts, Inc.'s operating profit covered its interest costs 0.1 times in the year to Dec 2025.
Cash vs debt
Net debtFull House Resorts, Inc. had $491 M more debt than cash (net debt) at Dec 2025.
Questions
What is Full House Resorts, Inc.'s return on equity?
Full House Resorts, Inc. lost 936.4% of its shareholders' money over the last year, lower than 98% of Consumer Cyclical companies in United States.
How much does Full House Resorts, Inc. owe compared with what it owns?
Full House Resorts, Inc. owes $1.02 for every $1 it owns, so it owes more than it owns, higher than 89% of Consumer Cyclical companies in United States.
Does Full House Resorts, Inc. pay a dividend?
No. Full House Resorts, Inc. does not currently pay a dividend.
Is Full House Resorts, Inc.'s revenue growing?
Revenue rose 4% in the year to Dec 2025, and grew 23% a year on average over 3 years.
Figures from the company's yearly results and PositoAI's own data. Full tables are on the Go Deep tab. What each figure means. PositoAI is for research and education only and is not investment advice.